Shopping cart

    Subtotal 0.00

    View cartCheckout

    Magazines cover a wide array subjects, including but not limited to fashion, lifestyle, health, politics, business, Entertainment, sports, science,

    Shopping cart

      Subtotal 0.00

      View cartCheckout

      Magazines cover a wide array subjects, including but not limited to fashion, lifestyle, health, politics, business, Entertainment, sports, science,

      Mumbai

      Homebuyers entitled to interest for delayed possession even if they accept revised timelines: Bombay HC

      Bombay HC
      Email :6

      The Bombay High Court has held that section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA) gives flat buyers an absolute right to claim compensatory interest for delayed possession, regardless of whether they accepted revised possession timelines.

      “[Under] Section 18 of RERA Act, the handing over possession as per the terms of the agreement or as per the date specified is sacrosanct, remaining unqualified by any contingencies outside the terms of the agreement, and is not affected by the acceptance of delayed performance,” justice Sharmila Deshmukh said, while dismissing an appeal by CCI Projects Pvt Ltd.

      The developer had challenged a March 2021 order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, which set aside a September 2018 MahaRERA order and directed the company to pay compensatory interest to seven buyers in its Wintergreen project for delayed possession.

      The buyers had received allotment letters in October 2011 promising possession by June 30, 2015. Sale agreements executed in March 2013 revised the possession date to February 2016.

      Although the buyers paid nearly the entire consideration, possession was delayed, prompting them to approach MahaRERA in May 2018 seeking interest at 10.35% on the amounts paid from March 1, 2016 until actual possession.

      MahaRERA noted that the project’s registered completion date had been extended from December 2018 to December 2019 and disposed of the complaints, permitting the buyers to seek interest after completion.

      The Appellate Tribunal, however, held that the buyers were entitled to compensatory interest for every month of delay, leading the developer to move the high court.

      Senior advocate Naushad Engineer, appearing for the developer, argued that the allottees had accepted the revised possession schedules without objection and the corresponding changes in the payment schedule.

      He contended that under Section 55 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, such acceptance amounted to consent to delayed performance, extinguishing any claim for compensatory interest unless prior notice was issued.

      0 0 votes
      Article Rating
      Subscribe
      Notify of
      guest
      0 Comments
      Oldest
      Newest Most Voted
      Inline Feedbacks
      View all comments

      Related Posts

      Join

      To Receive Daily Updates

      0
      Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
      ()
      x